Hub Login
Partner With Us
Insights

Breaking Barriers Across Asia-Pacific and Latin America 

Share

Home / Resources / Breaking Barriers Across Asia-Pacific and Latin America 

Date Published:

LGBTQ+ Workplace Inclusion: Regional Research Synthesis 

2026 APAC LGBTQ+ Workplace Inclusion Symposium

Synthesis 

Out & Equal’s 2024-2025 Breaking Barriers research series has examined LGBTQ+ workplace inclusion across four critical markets: Brazil, India, the Philippines, and Chile. Across nearly 2,700 respondent voices, these reports document the current state of workplace policies, practices, and lived experiences of LGBTQ+ employees in the Asia-Pacific and Latin American regions. 

This synthesis report provides a bird’s-eye view of key findings, regional patterns, and strategic imperatives for companies seeking to lead in LGBTQ+ inclusion across these diverse markets. 

Key Findings At a Glance 

Policy Adoption: Growth, But Implementation Gaps Persist 

Workplace non-discrimination policies show wide variation across the four markets, reflecting both legal progress and corporate leadership. The Philippines leads in policy adoption at 82%, followed by Chile (68% awareness), Brazil (57%), and India (38%)—a dramatic gap that signals urgent need for foundational work in India. 

Critical Finding: Policy existence does not equal policy effectiveness. Across all markets, 35-60% of employees report that colleagues have limited understanding of policies, and 50-80% of those experiencing discrimination do not report it. 

Visibility at Work: The Gap Between Psychological Safety and Authenticity 

The data reveals a striking correlation: countries with stronger legal protections and corporate policies show higher rates of LGBTQ+ visibility at work and phycological safety.  

Market Out at Work Legal Context 
Brazil 78% Same-sex marriage legal since 2013; strong anti-discrimination jurisprudence 
Philippines 60% No national LGBTQ+ protections; relies on corporate policy
Chile 41% feel safe Recent legislative progress (marriage equality 2021) 
India 20% fully open Recent decriminalization (2018); limited employment protections 

Insight: Visibility paradoxically increases discrimination risk—employees are making risk calculations based on witnessed patterns and explicit leadership signals. Specifically: Are there LGBTQ+ employees visible in senior leadership roles? What does the leadership team say publicly about LGBTQ+ inclusion and belonging? Do hiring announcements feature diverse faces, or do LGBTQ+ employees remain invisible despite stated policies? These observable patterns, more than policies, drive employee calculation of whether visibility is truly safe. 

The Infrastructure Imperative: ERGs and Support Systems 

Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) vary dramatically in adoption and maturity: 

  • Philippines: 76% have access (but implementation varies significantly between Manila headquarters and provincial offices). 
  • Brazil: High adoption in multinationals; limited presence in domestic firms. 
  • India: 27% access; represents a critical infrastructure gap. 
  • Chile: Present but often lack sponsorship, budget, and strategic mandate. 

Key Finding: ERG presence alone does not equal impact. Global evidence links strategic sponsorship, dedicated budgets, and defined business metrics to actual influence. When businesses stop at simply setting up ERGs, they miss out on the strategic advisory capacity, innovation counsel, and emerging market insights that resourced ERGs afford.  

The difference between an ERG as a social group and an ERG as a strategic business advisory council is not subtle—it’s the difference between ‘checking the box’ and ‘competitive advantage.’ Tie ERG impact to defined business metrics (product innovation speed, market entry success, talent retention improvement, leadership pipeline diversity), provide executive sponsorship from the C-suite, allocate budget and coordination time, and watch influence expand into organizational strategy. 

Benefits Equity: Partner Recognition and Healthcare Coverage 

Partner benefits adoption varies by market, shaped by legal frameworks and corporate innovation: 

Benefit Brazil India Philippines Chile 
Partner Benefits 41% 22% 65% N/A 
Gender-Affirming Care 25% 21% 47% Limited 
Accessible Facilities Variable 26% 53% Not measured 

Critical Gap: Despite legal marriage equality in Brazil and Chile, India and the Philippines show corporate benefits adoption exceeding legal recognition, demonstrating talent-driven leadership. 

Reporting and Trust: A Business Credibility Gap 

Trust in reporting mechanisms remains among the most significant gaps and represents a critical credibility challenge for organizational inclusion claims: 

  • Philippines: 76% confident complaints addressed (the highest). 
  • Brazil: 48% feel safe reporting (with a gap between MNC and domestic firms). 
  • India: 31% confident in reporting (a critical barrier to visibility and advancement). 
  • Chile: 46% believe DEI policies promote a respectful environment; yet 80% of those experiencing harassment never reported it. 

These Paradoxes Signal Broken Systems: High reported confidence does not necessarily translate into utilization. Reporting systems often exist on paper but lack credibility, anonymity guarantees, or third‑party oversight in practice, leaving many incidents unreported and unresolved.

This broken trust directly undermines organizational culture, erodes team cohesion, and signals that stated inclusion commitments are not backed by implementation rigor. For employers, non-reporting creates legal liability, missed early intervention opportunities, and hidden talent flight. 

Regional Insights & Strategic Imperatives 

Brazil: Market Leader, But Unequal Implementation 

Strengths: 

  • 78% of LGBTQ+ employees report feeling no need to hide identity. 
  • 57% of companies have anti-discrimination policies. 
  • Growing commitment reflected in HRC Equidad BR program (124 companies, 79 certified as best employers in 2024). 

Critical Gaps: 

  • Stark disparity between multinational (52% with trans-inclusive health insurance) and domestic firms (26%). 
  • 43% of domestic company employees report leadership never/rarely signals inclusion is part of strategy. 
  • Only 22% report hearing leaders proudly champion LGBTQ+ professionals. 
  • Regional concentration of formal employment in Southeast (77% of respondents); North and Northeast dramatically underrepresented. 

Strategic Imperative: Bridge the multinational-domestic firm gap through targeted LGBTQ+ inclusion training, visible leadership messaging on inclusion as business strategy, and partnership with local LGBTQ+ organizations.  

Domestic firms that invest in closing this gap can gain a significant competitive advantage in attracting diverse talent; MNCs should use Brazil as a model for their global rollout.  

Prioritize: leadership visibility, benefits equity (trans-inclusive health insurance in particular), and the geographic expansion of inclusion initiatives beyond a Southeast/São Paulo focus. 

Learn more in our report: Understanding Brazilian LGBTQIA Workplace Experiences

India: Foundational Work Required 

Strengths: 

  • Recent legal progress (decriminalization 2018, transgender recognition 2019). 
  • Growing corporate awareness among leading firms (Godrej, Wipro, Axis Bank, Mahindra). 
  • 80% of LGBTQ+ survey respondents rate inclusive policies as very important in employment decisions. 

Critical Gaps: 

  • Only 38% of workplaces have explicit non-discrimination policies protecting LGBTQ+ workers. 
  • 77% of LGBTQ+ respondents hear negative comments at work; 51% say LGBTQ+ employees are rarely/never visible in leadership. 
  • Only 20% are fully open about identity at work; 39% remain entirely closeted. 
  • Just 27% report having ERG or diversity council access. 
  • Limited awareness of policies (56% say few understand scope or enforcement). 
  • External community engagement is minimal: only 19% of companies partner with LGBTQ+ organizations. 

Strategic Imperative: India requires comprehensive foundational investment. With an estimated 135 million LGBTQ+ individuals and increasingly sophisticated Gen Z/Millennial cohorts (78% prioritize inclusion when evaluating employers), the talent market is signaling an increasingly urgent demand.  

Priority actions: explicit SOGIESC policy adoption with proactive communication, mandatory manager training, ERG establishment with sponsorship and budget, and strategic partnerships with organizations like Out & Equal and Pride Circle. Companies failing to invest in this decade will lose competitive advantage in attracting India’s next generation of talent. 

Learn more in our report: LGBTQI Workplace Inclusion in India 

Philippines: Policy Infrastructure, Implementation Challenges 

Paradox: Despite being Asia’s most socially accepting country for LGBTQ+ people, with 73% public acceptance reported by Pew, the Philippines still lacks comprehensive national anti-discrimination protections for the LGBTQ+ community. This makes corporate policy the de facto standard and creates both opportunity and risk. 

Strengths: 

  • 82% of companies have non-discrimination policies (highest among four markets). 
  • 76% provide ERG access. 
  • 65% offer partner benefits (without marriage equality). 
  • 60% of employees fully out at work (triple India’s rate). 

Critical Gaps: 

  • 26-point policy-practice gap: 82% have policies, but only 56% report colleagues understand them. 
  • ERG concentration: Infrastructure concentrated in Manila; provincial employees lack visibility and support. 
  • Gender-affirming care lags partner benefits (47% vs. 65%)—despite 11% of survey respondents being transgender or intersex. 
  • Only 9% engage in LGBTQ+-focused philanthropy; 19% have external partnerships. 

Strategic Imperative: Move from policy existence to policy effectiveness. For companies operating in the Philippines’ FDI-dependent markets, this represents a differentiation opportunity. When policies fail to reflect day-to-day reality, it’s not just a compliance gap; it’s a competitive advantage opportunity for employers willing to invest in better implementation. 

Priorities: operationalize policies through manager training, extend ERG infrastructure beyond Manila, implement gender-affirming healthcare, and establish measurement systems tied to utilization, not just adoption. 

Learn more in our report: Breaking Barriers LGBTQ Workplace Inclusion in the Philippines

Chile: Legislation Leading, Culture Catching Up 

Strengths: 

  • Recent legislative wins (Civil Union 2015, Gender Identity Law 2019, Equal Marriage 2021). 
  • 70 of 151 companies achieved top scores on Equidad Chile 2024 (recognition of improvement from 2015 baseline). 
  • Growing corporate commitment to LGBTQ+ inclusion. 

Critical Gaps: 

  • 35% of LGBTQ+ respondents have experienced workplace harrassment, discrimination, or violence; 25% are unsure.
  • 78% of trans respondents either experienced harassment or are unsure. 
  • 73% of those experiencing harassment or “workplace violence” report it significantly affected job performance; 80% never reported it. 
  • 68% unaware if company has LGBTQ+ anti-discrimination policies explicitly protecting sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (a communication failure despite such policies often existing). 
  • Only 46% believe inclusion policies promote a respectful, safe environment; 41% report their organization lacks such policies. 
  • Dramatic disparity in reporting of violence: 64% of women who experienced discrimination never reported vs. 17% of men. 

Strategic Imperative: Chile must address the culture-policy gap through: (1) visible, consistent leadership messaging affirming inclusion as business strategy and core values, (2) operational communication ensuring employees understand policies and know how to access resources, (3) safe and credible reporting channels with third-party oversight and response accountability, and (4) proactive harassment prevention training with manager accountability for intervention.  

The high incidence of harassment (35%), combined with low reporting (80% never report) and gender-specific barriers (64% of women vs. 17% of men), signals implementation challenges that transcend awareness—these require structural changes to credibility and psychological safety. 

Learn more in our report: Chile No Sabe 2024 – Understanding Chilean LGBTQ Workplace Experiences 

Cross-Cutting Themes 

Across all four markets, policy adoption outpaces policy implementation by 20-45 percentage points. This gap directly undermines: 

1. The Policy-Practice Gap Is Universal 

  • Employee confidence in reporting. 
  • Psychological safety. 
  • LGBTQ+ talent attraction and retention. 
  • Organizational credibility on inclusion. 

Recommendation: Companies should audit not whether policies exist, but whether employees understand them, trust them, and use them. 

2. Multinational vs. Domestic Firm Divergence 

Multinational corporations consistently outpace domestic firms on: 

  • Explicit LGBTQ+ policy adoption (Brazil: MNCs 74% vs. domestic 45%). 
  • Benefits provision like same-sex partner benefits and gender-affirming healthcare as talent-retention levers (Brazil: MNCs 52% trans-inclusive insurance vs. domestic 26%). 
  • Robust ERG resourcing and leadership sponsorship. 
  • External LGBTQ+ community engagement and partnership. 

This gap creates both challenges and opportunities for market-leading domestic firms to differentiate. 

3. Transgender and Intersex Visibility Lags 

Despite progress in policy adoption, transgender and intersex employees consistently report lower self-reported rates of phycological safety and visibility: 

  • India: Limited explicit protections despite legal recognition. 
  • Philippines: Gender-affirming care gap (47% vs. 65% partner benefits). 
  • Brazil: Trans employees less likely to access mentoring (39% vs. 57% overall). 
  • Chile: 78% of trans participants experienced or are uncertain about harassment. 

Imperative: Gender-affirming healthcare and trans-specific mentoring require explicit, strategic investment. 

4. Leadership Visibility Drives Culture Change 

Across all markets, LGBTQ+ employees report scarcity of visible LGBTQ+ leaders and minimal leadership messaging on inclusion as part of business strategy or a core organizational value. Where leaders actively and publicly champion inclusion: 

  • Employee willingness to recommend an employer increases. 
  • Employee likelihood of being out at work and career advancement confidence improves. 
  • ERGs shift from social/affinity groups to strategic business advisory councils. 
  • Psychological safety scores improve measurably. 
  • External perception of the employer improves (talent attraction advantage). 
  • This is not soft culture work—it’s measurable business impact. Leadership visibility on inclusion signals organizational credibility and removes perceived career risk for LGBTQ+ employees considering greater visibility and advancement. 

Global Context & Benchmarking

U.S. Corporate Equality Index (2025): 

  • 99% of participating U.S. companies have non-discrimination protections. 
  • 98% have ERG programs. 
  • 95% offer trans-inclusive health insurance. 
  • 77% have gender transition guidelines. 

Comparison: All four markets, including Brazil, the regional leader, fall significantly below U.S. benchmarks, highlighting the business case for accelerated investment. 

Recommendations for Organizations: A Tiered Approach

Tier 1: Foundational (All Markets, Especially India) 

  1. Adopt and clearly communicate explicit non-discrimination policies naming sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. 
  2. Establish confidential third-party reporting mechanisms separate from HR. 
  3. Secure executive sponsorship to signal organizational priority. 
  4. Communicate policies proactively beginning at recruitment; measure awareness, not just adoption. 

Tier 2: Infrastructure (Brazil, Philippines, Chile Priority) 

  1. Resource ERGs with dedicated budget, coordination, and C-suite executive sponsorship—this is where ERG impact shifts from social to strategic. Tie ERG value to measurable business outcomes: innovation speed, talent retention, leadership pipeline diversity. 
  2. Extend benefits to same-sex partners and dependents; add gender-affirming healthcare aligned to workforce composition (prioritize based on employee data). 
  3. Implement lived name/pronoun systems in all HR platforms, email, and employee directory—make inclusion operational and visible. 
  4. Conduct manager training on inclusive hiring, recognizing and intervening in harassment/discrimination in real-time, and psychological safety accountability (not just awareness). 

Tier 3: Leadership (Regional Differentiation) 

  1. Public advocacy on legal progress (SOGIESC Bill Philippines; continued Brazilian momentum; Chilean implementation). 
  2. External partnerships with LGBTQ+ organizations for cultural fluency and community connection. 
  3. Representation metrics tracking LGBTQ+ employees by seniority, identity type, and department. 
  4. Inclusive marketing featuring LGBTQ+ talent & leaders year-round, not only Pride month. 

The Business Case for Inclusion 

Research across all four markets quantifies the business case for inclusion: 

Brazil: McKinsey and Catalyst data indicates that diverse, inclusive cultures drive higher innovation, job satisfaction and employee engagement, and financial performance, reinforced by Equidade BR data linking LGBTQ+-inclusive policies to stronger employer branding and talent retention. For individual employers, the competitive advantage of outpacing domestic firms on benefits equity and leadership visibility translates to measurable talent attraction and retention improvements. 

India: With an estimated 135 million LGBTQ+ individuals and increasingly sophisticated Gen Z/Millennial cohorts (78% filter employers on inclusion signals), the talent market is actively evaluating inclusion commitment. Companies failing to invest in foundational policies, ERGs, and leadership visibility will lose competitive edge in attracting and retaining India’s next generation of talent. This is not a 2030 problem—it’s a competitive reality today. 

Philippines: Open for Business 2025 data estimates a PHP 147.6 billion annual economic loss from LGBTQ+ discrimination (0.67% of GDP). For individual employers, this translates to specific, measurable costs: lost productivity from employees hiding identity (reduced job performance, reduced innovation contribution), higher turnover (replacement costs), and missed market insights from underutilized diverse perspectives. Companies closing the policy-practice gap gain competitive advantage. 

Chile: 35% of LGBTQ+ employees experienced harassment or discrimination; 73% of those affected report significant impacts on job performance—directly translating into productivity loss, turnover risk, and innovation deficit. For employers, the business case is urgent: address the culture-policy gap, implement credible reporting, and measure impact on retention and performance. 

Global Context: Out & Equal’s research across all four markets shows: LGBTQ+ employees who are out at work report 62% job satisfaction versus 48% for closeted employees. Companies perceived as inclusive employers gain 15-20% advantage in LGBTQ+ talent attraction. In a competitive talent market, inclusion is not a nice-to-have—it’s a business imperative. 

Looking Forward: 2026-2027 Imperatives

The Urgency Factor: 

Socio-economic support for workplace inclusion and belonging is accelerating across all four markets. Companies that invest in LGBTQ+ workplace inclusion in 2026 and beyond will be positioned as culture leaders as regional legal frameworks catch up, including the Philippines’ SOGIESC Bill, Brazil’s Decent Work Strategy, and Chile’s ongoing implementation efforts.  

By contrast, organizations that wait for legal mandates to drive action risk higher catch-up costs and credibility gaps with emerging workforce cohorts that expect clear inclusion signals from day one. — The talent market is ready. The business case is clear. The implementation gap is real, and it is precisely where competitive advantage now lies for market-leading employers. 

Demographic Shifts: 

  • Gen Z entering workforce with 75-76% support for LGBTQ+ inclusion (vs. 61% for Millennials) 
  • LGBTQ+ talent increasingly filtering employers on inclusion signals 

Legislative Momentum: 

  • Philippines: SOGIESC Bill refiled July 2025 after 25-year stall; business support growing 
  • Brazil: National Secretariat for LGBTQ+ Rights advancing Decent Work Strategy; companies positioned to lead 
  • Chile: Ongoing implementation and more recent pushback on legislative gains 
  • India: Corporate leadership filling legal gaps; business case for voluntary adoption strong 

Market Opportunity: 

  • Global Pink Market valued at nearly $5 trillion USD 
  • LGBTQ+ employees who are out at work report 62% job satisfaction vs. 48% closeted (global estimate)
  • Companies perceived as inclusive employers gain 15-20% advantage in LGBTQ+ talent attraction 

About these Reports

Breaking Barriers Series (2024-2025) 

Combined Respondent Base: 2,644 employees across formal labor markets in four key regions 

Partners: Out & Equal collaborated with local organizations in each market (Pride Circle India; PFIP Philippines; Instituto Mais Diversidade Brazil; Factor Diverso Chile) to ensure cultural relevance, local expertise, and community-grounded data collection best practices. 

You May Also Like

View All